In short
- Across all eight areas, colleagues' average was 3.8 on a 1 to 5 frequency scale.
- Described consistently as working well: Sound Judgment, Collaboration & Relationships, Trust & Credibility.
- Suggested development discussion order, calculated from the answers using a rule that was fixed before collection (importance first, then distance from the target): Strategic Perspective, Communication & Influence.
- The written section below explains the numbers. It never changes them.
Overall average: 3.8. Averages are descriptive summaries of how often colleagues said something happened. They are not percentiles, benchmarks, calibrated scores or comparisons with other people. The written section is never combined with them into a single score.
Area by area
| Area | Colleagues | You | Aiming for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound Judgment | 4.1 | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Execution & Accountability | 3.9 | 4.8 | 4.0 |
| Communication & Influence | 2.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Collaboration & Relationships | 4.1 | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Strategic Perspective | 2.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Adaptability & Learning | 3.9 | 4.8 | 4.0 |
| Trust & Credibility | 4.8 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Initiative & Constructive Challenge | 3.9 | 4.8 | 4.0 |
Numbers describe how often people saw something in the last 90 days. They are a starting point for a conversation, not a performance rating.
Where to focus first
- Strategic Perspective — colleagues 2.9, aiming for 4.0
- Communication & Influence — colleagues 2.9, aiming for 4.0
What people described
3 colleagues independently described this as working well in Trust & Credibility.
Described by 3 people · Trust & Credibility
3 colleagues independently described this as something to work on in Strategic Perspective.
Described by 3 people · Strategic Perspective